兩機車相撞…闖紅燈的起訴 超速的不起訴 - 重機
By Daph Bay
at 2012-05-27T11:05
at 2012-05-27T11:05
Table of Contents
全文網址: 兩機車相撞…闖紅燈的起訴 超速的不起訴 | 肇事究責看路權 | 國內要聞 |
聯合新聞網 http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS1/7119044.shtml#ixzz1w2DHazio
Power By udn.com
高雄市兩輛重型機車相撞,趙姓男子超速,林姓男子闖紅燈,雙雙移送法辦。高雄地檢署
接受車輛行車事故鑑定委員會鑑定意見,認定闖紅燈是肇事原因,裁定趙沒有肇事責任,
不起訴。
檢察官認為,交通規則對於「車行速限」,目的在於「確保與前車的安全間距,使駕駛人
能在緊急情況下及時煞住,不致撞及前車」,趙姓男子雖超速行駛,但是遵守燈號指示行
駛,主要是遭闖紅燈的林姓男子攔腰撞上,所以超速與車禍沒有因果關係。
市警局交通大隊中隊長侯智評昨天說,近年來交通事故都是以路權觀念來鑑定肇事責任,
以本案來說,路權屬綠燈行駛的趙姓男子,因此林須為肇事負責,但如果兩車同向行駛,
趙可能就會有肇事責任,所以行車一定要遵守交通規則。
高雄地檢署調查,趙姓男子(廿歲)去年八月凌晨,騎重型機車往高雄港方向行駛,車速
約五十公里,涉嫌超速十公里,此時林姓男子騎重型機車載陳姓女子,行經四維路與林森
路口時,涉嫌闖紅燈撞上趙。
罪嫌移送法辦,趙承認超速行駛,但因綠燈且在正常車道行駛,沒肇事責任,裁定不起訴
;至於林的過失致死刑責,檢察官另案偵辦中。
--
Tags:
重機
All Comments
By Sandy
at 2012-05-29T03:48
at 2012-05-29T03:48
By Emma
at 2012-06-02T05:14
at 2012-06-02T05:14
By Erin
at 2012-06-04T02:47
at 2012-06-04T02:47
By Oscar
at 2012-06-05T10:31
at 2012-06-05T10:31
By Anthony
at 2012-06-09T11:32
at 2012-06-09T11:32
By Regina
at 2012-06-12T15:29
at 2012-06-12T15:29
By Blanche
at 2012-06-15T21:18
at 2012-06-15T21:18
By Leila
at 2012-06-18T04:17
at 2012-06-18T04:17
By Puput
at 2012-06-20T03:18
at 2012-06-20T03:18
By Jacky
at 2012-06-20T11:44
at 2012-06-20T11:44
By Joseph
at 2012-06-23T11:29
at 2012-06-23T11:29
By Ophelia
at 2012-06-26T05:44
at 2012-06-26T05:44
Related Posts
XJ6N CP值最高的後箱或側箱
By Kristin
at 2012-05-27T10:02
at 2012-05-27T10:02
老婦穿快車道被撞死 子女須賠肇事者
By Sandy
at 2012-05-27T08:22
at 2012-05-27T08:22
準備牽新車囉 XJ6n
By Belly
at 2012-05-27T01:13
at 2012-05-27T01:13
黑心機車用品賣家及投訴過程分享
By Selena
at 2012-05-26T20:51
at 2012-05-26T20:51
售一頂全新 agv s4 紅色安全帽
By Carol
at 2012-05-26T14:30
at 2012-05-26T14:30