20年老車挨撞 法官判太舊免賠 - 機車

By Gilbert
at 2012-12-06T23:24
at 2012-12-06T23:24
Table of Contents
我不太懂折舊和賠償在法律上應該怎麼算
不過以車主的立場想
問題在於法官判"免賠"
一台GY6的實動車,就像上一篇Y大說的
也要個幾千吧?
二手車行整理完的,也要賣個一萬出頭
以肇事方或法官認定,賠$13XXX不合理、
不符合原車價值
這我可以接受,畢竟不是車行整理完、整車新殼(只有殼整理過XD)的車
但過於老舊 = 無價值 = 免賠
這就太誇張了吧
撞爛的拿去殺肉或當廢鐵秤都有幾百耶
這篇新聞真的是教大家對老車不用客氣@@
然後車禍復原要請老闆工資分開算、開高一點
--
Tags:
機車
All Comments

By Ivy
at 2012-12-10T07:01
at 2012-12-10T07:01

By Madame
at 2012-12-12T01:03
at 2012-12-12T01:03
法條是三年就一折了 那二十年還是一折嗎...

By Kristin
at 2012-12-15T22:27
at 2012-12-15T22:27

By Olivia
at 2012-12-20T02:08
at 2012-12-20T02:08

By Dora
at 2012-12-20T23:46
at 2012-12-20T23:46

By Hazel
at 2012-12-21T08:47
at 2012-12-21T08:47

By Vanessa
at 2012-12-24T04:05
at 2012-12-24T04:05
還是自知理虧? 不過上訴要個三千元好像怪怪的...

By Regina
at 2012-12-29T00:53
at 2012-12-29T00:53
去法院也是要成本的

By Linda
at 2012-12-31T20:28
at 2012-12-31T20:28
這不是自知理虧與否 這是成本和風險問題

By Blanche
at 2013-01-05T06:38
at 2013-01-05T06:38

By Zanna
at 2013-01-08T01:11
at 2013-01-08T01:11

By Sierra Rose
at 2013-01-09T05:51
at 2013-01-09T05:51

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2013-01-12T23:34
at 2013-01-12T23:34

By Isla
at 2013-01-16T11:25
at 2013-01-16T11:25
場行情

By Anonymous
at 2013-01-18T15:41
at 2013-01-18T15:41
往往會不耐煩 甚至怪給立法者 說"還不是你們百姓選出來的"
能大刀闊斧 因時制宜的 不是官運不順就是黯然退場 前輩說
是 誰敢推翻 民法幾年了 判例呢 穩穩沿用就好不管時空背景
才不用背責任 再說我換車搞不好比你換手機還快 才管你生計

By James
at 2013-01-22T11:38
at 2013-01-22T11:38

By Iris
at 2013-01-26T00:50
at 2013-01-26T00:50

By Joseph
at 2013-01-29T18:34
at 2013-01-29T18:34

By Heather
at 2013-02-03T11:33
at 2013-02-03T11:33

By Ursula
at 2013-02-04T09:13
at 2013-02-04T09:13
Related Posts
yamaha召回

By Olive
at 2012-12-06T22:44
at 2012-12-06T22:44
二手車行收車價

By Queena
at 2012-12-06T22:39
at 2012-12-06T22:39
今早中興橋的車禍.....

By Andrew
at 2012-12-06T21:46
at 2012-12-06T21:46
新競戰忽然卡轉上不去

By Aaliyah
at 2012-12-06T19:26
at 2012-12-06T19:26
20年老車挨撞 法官判太舊免賠

By Tracy
at 2012-12-06T19:18
at 2012-12-06T19:18