楊照:為什麼捷運沒人搭? - 重機

By Regina
at 2009-04-27T23:49
at 2009-04-27T23:49
Table of Contents
說公車使用率還不夠高不能蓋捷運,這是可議的
可是要說公車使用率不夠高是因為摩托車太多,這就有點尿不準怪馬桶歪了
說真的,大眾運輸的確是佛心事業
沒先用很方便的大眾運輸來養乘客,以後要再搞就要等到自用車把路擠爆之後
就像台北那樣的歷史演進,就是屬於後者
高捷這樣虧錢有什麼大不了的,京都地下鐵也是虧錢在做
如果不能像右派那樣賺錢營利,那像左派那樣當作公共設施也是可以
反正多多少少都會挿官股進去
的確高雄馬路也還不到公車塞爆的程度,但是少了那一堆柴油引擎在路上跑也不錯阿
就當作是花了錢來換好環境
再說到台中要蓋捷運
就算捷運本身不能賺錢,只要能跟整個市府的年度預算平衡也無妨
捷運跟柏油路,各位比較願意用哪個交通建設來消化預算呢?
就當作是發展完整大眾交通運輸的前期,在那個砸錢養乘客的階段就是了
公車使用率低,那可以給公車多一點路權阿
像是很簡單的公車專用道,不僅不會有靠邊停站時的後方車流大混戰
硬體設施的需求也很低,公車的效率也增加
這種時候講管制摩托車實在很負面,怎麼不會想想正面的積極做法該怎麼做
--
話說我玩模擬城市的時候都是直接把捷運蓋成井字型的----只有方便再方便啦~~~~
--
Tags:
重機
All Comments

By George
at 2009-04-29T00:19
at 2009-04-29T00:19

By William
at 2009-05-02T18:31
at 2009-05-02T18:31

By Necoo
at 2009-05-04T17:05
at 2009-05-04T17:05

By Odelette
at 2009-05-09T02:54
at 2009-05-09T02:54

By Zenobia
at 2009-05-14T02:31
at 2009-05-14T02:31

By Lucy
at 2009-05-16T04:20
at 2009-05-16T04:20

By Adele
at 2009-05-20T18:00
at 2009-05-20T18:00

By Hedda
at 2009-05-24T23:16
at 2009-05-24T23:16

By Ingrid
at 2009-05-27T01:08
at 2009-05-27T01:08

By Hazel
at 2009-05-29T00:58
at 2009-05-29T00:58

By Queena
at 2009-06-01T21:34
at 2009-06-01T21:34

By Carolina Franco
at 2009-06-02T14:51
at 2009-06-02T14:51

By Edward Lewis
at 2009-06-04T18:02
at 2009-06-04T18:02

By Sarah
at 2009-06-07T01:13
at 2009-06-07T01:13

By Enid
at 2009-06-11T01:23
at 2009-06-11T01:23

By Hedwig
at 2009-06-12T01:06
at 2009-06-12T01:06

By Rosalind
at 2009-06-15T17:09
at 2009-06-15T17:09

By Quintina
at 2009-06-18T04:01
at 2009-06-18T04:01

By Daph Bay
at 2009-06-22T01:22
at 2009-06-22T01:22

By Eartha
at 2009-06-25T01:58
at 2009-06-25T01:58

By Delia
at 2009-06-27T16:43
at 2009-06-27T16:43
Related Posts
烏來喇賽團 (短短一段)

By Jake
at 2009-04-27T20:05
at 2009-04-27T20:05
重機族吵到小孩睡覺了

By Charlotte
at 2009-04-27T19:01
at 2009-04-27T19:01
重機族吵到小孩睡覺了

By Jack
at 2009-04-27T18:56
at 2009-04-27T18:56
重機族吵到小孩睡覺了

By Mason
at 2009-04-27T18:40
at 2009-04-27T18:40
重機族吵到小孩睡覺了

By Donna
at 2009-04-27T17:40
at 2009-04-27T17:40